Structure Determination, Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability of Co2MoB4 and Fe2MoB4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The precise determination of atomic position of materials is critical for understanding the relationship between structure and properties, especially for compounds with light elements of boron and single or multiple transition metals. In this work, the single crystal X-ray diffraction is employed to analyze the atomic positions of Co2MoB4 and Fe2MoB4 with a Ta3B4-type structure, and it is found that the lengths of B-B bonds connecting the two zig-zag boron chains are 1.86 Å and 1.87 Å, but previously unreported 1.4 Å. Co and Fe atoms occupy the same crystallographic position in lattice for the doped samples and the valence is close to the metal itself, and Co/Fe K-edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure(XAFS) spectra of borides with different ratios of Co to Fe are collected to detect the local environment and chemical valence of Co and Fe. Vickers hardness and nano indentation measurements are performed, together with the Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. Finally, Co2MoB4 possess better thermal stability than Fe2MoB4 evaluated by Thermogravimetric Differential Thermal Analysis (TG-DTA) results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".