‘Quite a pleasant little afternoon’s sport’: Imperial Femininity and Hunting Culture in <i>Impressions of a Tenderfoot</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the 1890 book Impressions of a Tenderfoot during a journey in search of sport in the Far West, by Susan MacKinnon St Maur. It argues that St Maur used conventions of male-produced texts on hunting and masculine notions of sport, while drawing on ‘feminine’ themes and topics as well, charting a unique ‘imperial femininity’ (Procida 2001). She proclaimed her ability to participate in male-coded outdoor activities, and argued for her place in the British Empire. Instead of obviously appropriating masculinity and challenging normative femininity, she found ways to make her exploits more palatable to her readers, while still asserting her status as a ‘sportsman’. Descriptions of the people she meets, whether settler or Indigenous, and her concern with race and the politics of imperialism, stress her place in the hierarchy of the colonial project, based on her own race and class, complicating normative gender roles of the period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".