MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224602492 · doi:10.1680/jencm.21.00013

Vibration analysis of buried pipelines and piles using differential transformation method

2022· article· en· W4224602492 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Khabiri, Armin Saeedi Javadi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessSpring (device)VibrationStructural engineeringBoundary value problemBeam (structure)Pipeline transportDifferential equationEuler's formulaFoundation (evidence)GeologyMathematical analysisMechanicsEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigating the interaction between structures and their elastic foundations is essential in structures with elastic support conditions, such as buried pipelines and piles. Research investigation was carried out to find the frequency of a buried structure simulated by Euler–Bernoulli beam equations, with distributed damping and general boundary conditions on an elastic foundation. The elastic bed was modelled by a linear spring, and boundary conditions were changeable at two ends of the beam's support with variations in the stiffness of transitional and rotational springs. The differential transformation method (DTM) was then used to solve the equations by correlating the function and its derivatives. The frequency of the structure was obtained for various damping and stiffness values. The increase in the stiffness of the elastic support and the decrease in damping led to a higher frequency. The results of DTM agreed with the results of the exact method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational MechanicsSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207