MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224621011 · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.798446

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Events in Exercise Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2022· article· en· W4224621011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tao Shen, Chuan Ren, Wei Zhao, Liyuan Tao, Shunlin Xu, Chengduo Zhang, Wei Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIInternal medicineCardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionCohortCoronary artery diseaseAnginaVentricular tachycardiaNomogramCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aimed to develop a model for predicting cardiovascular events in the exercise assessment of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on multidimensional clinical information. Methods: A total of 2,455 post-PCI patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at the Peking University Third Hospital from January 2016 to September 2019 were retrospectively included in this study; 1,449 post-PCI patients from January 2018 to September 2019 were assigned as the development cohort; and 1,006 post-PCI patients from January 2016 to December 2017 were assigned as the validation cohort. Clinical data of patients before testing and various indicators in the exercise assessment were collected. CPET-related cardiovascular events were also collected, including new-onset angina pectoris, frequent premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia, and bundle branch block during the examination. A nomogram model for predicting CPET-related cardiovascular events was further developed and validated. Results: slope > 30. The C-index of the nomogram model for predicting CPET-related cardiovascular events was 0.830, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.830 (95% CI: 0.764-0.896). For the validation cohort of 1,006 patients, the area under the ROC curve was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.737-0.877). Conclusion: Post-PCI patients with older age, unsatisfactory blood glucose control, impaired left ventricular systolic function, oxygen uptake parameter trajectory inflection, and poor ventilation efficiency have a higher risk of cardiovascular events in exercise assessment. The nomogram prediction model performs well in predicting cardiovascular events in the exercise assessment of post-PCI patients and can provide an individualized plan for exercise risk prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207