MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224623385 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1565558/v1

Sedimentary Responses of Late Triassic Soft Sedimentary Deformation to Paleoearthquake Events in the Southwest of North China Plate

2022· preprint· en· W4224623385 on OpenAlexaff
Qingshao Liang, Wei Yu, Jingchun Tian, Yonglin Han, Feng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary rockOutcropPaleontologySedimentary structuresTectonicsSedimentary depositional environmentStructural basinBeddingPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tectonic events caused by paleoearthquakes have a good response in sedimentary filling. Outcrops and cores from the Chang-7 Member of the Late Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin in Northern China, yield a wide variety of soft sedimentary deformation structures (SSDSs), many of which are laterally extensive for more than 150 km. They include various types of folds, soft sediment liquefaction deformation (liquefied sandstone dyke, liquefied breccia), gravity-driven deformation (load structures, ball-and-pillow structures), hydraplastic deformation (loop bedding, convolute deformation) and brittle deformation (intrastratal faults and stair-step microfaults, microcracks). In most cases, deformation is represented by hybrid brittle-ductile structures exhibiting lateral variation in deformation style. These occur in delta front to semideep to deep lake sands and mudstones (shales). The seismites recognized in outcrops and cores indicate earthquakes with magnitudes between 6 and 8, which are interpreted as a response to splicing collision orogenic events of the South China Block (SCB) and North China Block (NCB) during the Late Triassic period. Systematic study of the spatial and temporal distribution of these seismites improves the understanding of the tectonic context and evolutionary history of sedimentary basements. This study can provide a new perspective on the evolution of tectonic activities in the basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207