MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224862961 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10429-z

Clinical target segmentation using a novel deep neural network: double attention Res-U-Net

2022· article· en· W4224862961 on OpenAlexaff
Vahid Ashkani Chenarlogh, Ali Shabanzadeh, Mostafa Ghelich Oghli, Nasim Sirjani, Sahar Farzin Moghadam, Ardavan Akhavan, Hossein Arabi, Isaac Shiri, Zahra Shabanzadeh, Morteza Sanei Taheri, Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJaccard indexSegmentationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSørensen–Dice coefficientPattern recognition (psychology)Dropout (neural networks)DiceNoise (video)Image segmentationArtificial neural networkEncoderEncoding (memory)Image (mathematics)Machine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduced Double Attention Res-U-Net architecture to address medical image segmentation problem in different medical imaging system. Accurate medical image segmentation suffers from some challenges including, difficulty of different interest object modeling, presence of noise, and signal dropout throughout the measurement. The base line image segmentation approaches are not sufficient for complex target segmentation throughout the various medical image types. To overcome the issues, a novel U-Net-based model proposed that consists of two consecutive networks with five and four encoding and decoding levels respectively. In each of networks, there are four residual blocks between the encoder-decoder path and skip connections that help the networks to tackle the vanishing gradient problem, followed by the multi-scale attention gates to generate richer contextual information. To evaluate our architecture, we investigated three distinct data-sets, (i.e., CVC-ClinicDB dataset, Multi-site MRI dataset, and a collected ultrasound dataset). The proposed algorithm achieved Dice and Jaccard coefficients of 95.79%, 91.62%, respectively for CRL, and 93.84% and 89.08% for fetal foot segmentation. Moreover, the proposed model outperformed the state-of-the-art U-Net based model on the external CVC-ClinicDB, and multi-site MRI datasets with Dice and Jaccard coefficients of 83%, 75.31% for CVC-ClinicDB, and 92.07% and 87.14% for multi-site MRI dataset, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207