Proceedings of the 19<sup>th</sup> International Conference on Ion Sources, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2021
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 19 th International Conference on Ion Sources was hosted by TRIUMF in Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 20 to September 24, 2021. The biennial conference series covers the physics and technology of ion sources for scientific research and applications. With the conference being the main event within the ion sources community, it offers a forum for the exchange of ideas and the establishing of collaborations. New developments and advancements have been presented and discussed. As in previous conferences of this series, all aspects of ion sources have been covered in the categories • Fundamental processes in ion sources and plasmas • Production of high intensity ion beams • Production of highly charged ion beams • Negative ion sources • Ion sources for fusion • Radioactive ion sources, charge breeders and polarized beams • Beam formation, extraction, transport, and diagnostics • Applications of ion sources • Key technologies for ion sources Due to restrictions on traveling and meeting sizes caused by health regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic, the conference was held as a virtual conference. Talks have been presented via ZOOM and two poster sessions were held within the remote meeting platform “Gather town”, which was also open for discussions among participants outside the plenary sessions. The main session on electron beam ion sources was dedicated to the memory of Professor Dr. Evgeny Denisovich Donets who, to our great regret, passed away in June 2021. Professor Donets was the inventor of the electron beam ion source and one of the initiators of this conference series. He was a longtime member of the international advisory committee. His memory will be highly regarded within the ion source community. List of International advisory committee, Scientific program committee, Local organizing committee are available in this pdf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it