33 Persistent Testosterone Suppression After Cessation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction ADT plays a fundamental role in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, there is limited data regarding testosterone recovery in men who have received ADT for prostate cancer. Identification of T recovery profiles associated with ADTs will facilitate personalization of ADT regimens and guide future treatment strategies to minimize the risk of T deficiency in patients with prostate cancer. Objective Temporary use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, the ability for testosterone to recover after ADT is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate testosterone recovery in men with prostate cancer following varying ADT modalities and treatment durations. Methods A global federated health research network (TriNetX) was used to identify men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent temporary use of ADT. Three cohorts were identified: Men who received LHRH antagonists, LHRH agonists, and men who received combined ADT (LHRH agonist and antiandrogens). Further stratification was based on treatment duration of 6 or 18 months to compare T recovery profiles at follow up periods of 2 and 5 years. Results A total of 17,884 men received LHRH agonists alone, 12,767 men received combined ADT, and 628 men received LHRH antagonist therapy alone. Eugondal mean baseline T level (>300 ng/dL) prior to starting ADT was an inclusion criterion for all men. Five years after ADT cessation, 36% of patients who received LHRH agonists recovered eugondal T levels, 26% recovered after LHRH antagonist therapy, and 36.8% recovered after combined ADT. Overall, more than half of men who received ADT failed to recover eugondal T levels even 5 years after treatment cessation. Conclusions Five years after ADT cessation, incomplete testosterone recovery persists in more than 50% of men. Testosterone deficiency will lead to metabolically adverse changes in body composition, increased insulin resistance, impaired bone health, and poor quality of life and needs to be evaluated even after cessation of ADT. Disclosure No
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".