Mobile sealing and repairing of damaged ceramic coatings by powder aerosol deposition at room temperature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Repair instead of discard is going to be crucial in the vision of a green future, therefore we propose the powder aerosol deposition (PAD) as a promising technique to reprocess ceramic coatings at room temperature. Alumina coated copper substrates with an artificial imperfection are manufactured in a first step. In a second step, the repair of this imperfection is carried out using two different PAD apparatuses: first, a conventional PAD apparatus with a moving substrate holder and a converging slit nozzle and second, a miniaturized μPAD apparatus with a fixed substrate holder and a circular de-Laval nozzle. The different film profiles are studied using a laser scanning confocal microscope. Cross-sectional images to investigate the microstructure are taken by a scanning electron microscope. Finally, samples of both PAD apparatuses are exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere at 400 °C proving the gas-tightness as a further quality feature of the repair coating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it