Immunospecific analysis of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>ex vivo</i> surface-immobilized protein complex
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomaterials used for blood contacting devices are inherently thrombogenic. Antithrombotic agents can be used as surface modifiers on biomaterials to reduce thrombus formation on the surface and to maintain device efficacy. For quality control and to assess the effectiveness of immobilization strategies, it is necessary to quantify the surface-immobilized antithrombotic agent directly. There are limited methods that allow direct quantification on device surfaces such as catheters. In this study, an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has been developed to measure the density of a synthetic antithrombin-heparin (ATH) covalent complex immobilized on a catheter surface. The distribution of the immobilized ATH was further characterized by an immunohistochemical assay. This analyte-specific EIA is relatively simple and has high throughput, thus providing a tool for quantitative analysis of biomaterial surface modifications. These methods may be further modified to evaluate plasma proteins adsorbed and immobilized on various biomaterial surfaces of complex shapes, with a range of bioactive functionalities, as well as to assess conformational changes of proteins using specific antibodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it