Smart EV Charging Strategies Based on Charging Behavior
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coming years, the number of electric vehicles (EVs) shall increase significantly, so the demand for electricity for charging EVs will proportionately increase as well. Thus, the growing energy requirements for charging these EVs might put huge burden on the electricity generation and supply infrastructure. Such a huge load growth opportunity for utilities if integrated successfully, or if not, a significant challenge to operate and balance grid loads in the future. Customarily, the increase in adoption of EVs in recent years has yielded challenges to the utilities as the electricity demand of EVs occurs mostly during peak hours. In some cases, a sojourn time may be longer than a charging time, that means, EVs will be connected to the charging station without charging. However, the load shifting potential of EVs may be consequential and might subsequently be used to alleviate challenges to the electric grid system. Considering charging behaviors for EV scheduling is crucial, as they depend on uncertainties of EV availabilities (i.e., sojourn time and energy required). Such uncertainties would impact substantially on the deployment of feasible EV charging scheduling. To address above-mentioned issues, firstly, we define an idle time ratio, which is basically load shifting potential. Consequently, we develop a heuristic EV charging scheduling scheme with an emphasis on inevitable charging behaviors of the EV users. Such a scheduling incorporates priority determination using the idle time ratio and TOU period as well as priority-based time slot allocation. Moreover, accurate prioritization of EVs is realized by predicting the energy demand and idle time ratio. Minimization of charging cost is perhaps the most perceptive objective, such that, the EV charging scheduling is done when TOU tariff is low. Performance evaluation shows that the proposed flexible smart charging scheduling outperforms the baseline scheduling in terms of the charging power and charging cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it