MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Linear-Time Sampling on Signed Graphs Via Gershgorin Disc Perfect Alignment

2022· article· en· W4224931240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsYork UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsLaplacian matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematicsGraphDiscrete mathematicsPairwise comparisonAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In graph signal processing (GSP), an appropriate underlying graph encodes pairwise (anti-)correlations of targeted discrete signals as edge weights. However, existing fast graph sampling schemes are designed and tested for positive graphs describing only positive correlations. In this paper, we show that for datasets with inherent strong anti-correlations, a suitable graph structure is instead a signed graph with both positive and negative edge weights, and in response, we propose a linear-time signed graph sampling method. Specifically, given an empirical covariance data matrix ${\mathbf{\bar C}}$, we first employ graphical lasso to learn a sparse inverse matrix $\mathcal{L}$, interpreted as a generalized graph Laplacian for signed graph $\mathcal{G}$. We then propose a fast signed graph sampling scheme containing three steps: i) augment $\mathcal{G}$ to a balanced graph ${\mathcal{G}_B}$, ii) align all Gershgorin disc left-ends of corresponding Laplacian ${\mathcal{L}_B}$ at smallest eigenvalue ${\lambda _{\min }}\left( {{\mathcal{L}_B}} \right)$ via similarity transform ${\mathcal{L}_p} = {\mathbf{S}}{\mathcal{L}_B}{{\mathbf{S}}^{ - 1}}$, leveraging a recent linear algebra theorem called Gershgorin disc perfect alignment (GDPA), and iii) perform sampling on ${\mathcal{L}_p}$ using a previous fast Gershgorin disc alignment sampling scheme (GDAS). Experimental results show that our signed graph sampling method outperformed existing fast sampling schemes noticeably on two political voting datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it