MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Linear-Time Sampling on Signed Graphs Via Gershgorin Disc Perfect Alignment

2022· article· en· W4224931240 on OpenAlexaff
Chinthaka Dinesh, Saghar Bagheri, Gene Cheung, Ivan V. Bajić

Bibliographic record

VenueICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsYork UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsLaplacian matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematicsGraphDiscrete mathematicsPairwise comparisonAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In graph signal processing (GSP), an appropriate underlying graph encodes pairwise (anti-)correlations of targeted discrete signals as edge weights. However, existing fast graph sampling schemes are designed and tested for positive graphs describing only positive correlations. In this paper, we show that for datasets with inherent strong anti-correlations, a suitable graph structure is instead a signed graph with both positive and negative edge weights, and in response, we propose a linear-time signed graph sampling method. Specifically, given an empirical covariance data matrix ${\mathbf{\bar C}}$, we first employ graphical lasso to learn a sparse inverse matrix $\mathcal{L}$, interpreted as a generalized graph Laplacian for signed graph $\mathcal{G}$. We then propose a fast signed graph sampling scheme containing three steps: i) augment $\mathcal{G}$ to a balanced graph ${\mathcal{G}_B}$, ii) align all Gershgorin disc left-ends of corresponding Laplacian ${\mathcal{L}_B}$ at smallest eigenvalue ${\lambda _{\min }}\left( {{\mathcal{L}_B}} \right)$ via similarity transform ${\mathcal{L}_p} = {\mathbf{S}}{\mathcal{L}_B}{{\mathbf{S}}^{ - 1}}$, leveraging a recent linear algebra theorem called Gershgorin disc perfect alignment (GDPA), and iii) perform sampling on ${\mathcal{L}_p}$ using a previous fast Gershgorin disc alignment sampling scheme (GDAS). Experimental results show that our signed graph sampling method outperformed existing fast sampling schemes noticeably on two political voting datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)Same topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207