Linear-Time Sampling on Signed Graphs Via Gershgorin Disc Perfect Alignment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In graph signal processing (GSP), an appropriate underlying graph encodes pairwise (anti-)correlations of targeted discrete signals as edge weights. However, existing fast graph sampling schemes are designed and tested for positive graphs describing only positive correlations. In this paper, we show that for datasets with inherent strong anti-correlations, a suitable graph structure is instead a signed graph with both positive and negative edge weights, and in response, we propose a linear-time signed graph sampling method. Specifically, given an empirical covariance data matrix ${\mathbf{\bar C}}$, we first employ graphical lasso to learn a sparse inverse matrix $\mathcal{L}$, interpreted as a generalized graph Laplacian for signed graph $\mathcal{G}$. We then propose a fast signed graph sampling scheme containing three steps: i) augment $\mathcal{G}$ to a balanced graph ${\mathcal{G}_B}$, ii) align all Gershgorin disc left-ends of corresponding Laplacian ${\mathcal{L}_B}$ at smallest eigenvalue ${\lambda _{\min }}\left( {{\mathcal{L}_B}} \right)$ via similarity transform ${\mathcal{L}_p} = {\mathbf{S}}{\mathcal{L}_B}{{\mathbf{S}}^{ - 1}}$, leveraging a recent linear algebra theorem called Gershgorin disc perfect alignment (GDPA), and iii) perform sampling on ${\mathcal{L}_p}$ using a previous fast Gershgorin disc alignment sampling scheme (GDAS). Experimental results show that our signed graph sampling method outperformed existing fast sampling schemes noticeably on two political voting datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it