MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224941645 · doi:10.1145/3520273.3520277

ASE4Games 2021 Workshop Summary

2022· article· en· W4224941645 on OpenAlexaff
Kendra Cooper, Fábio Petrillo, Yann‐Gaël Guéhéneuc, Cristiano Politowski

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiCentre for Social Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware engineeringComputer scienceSoftwareEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first edition of the workshop on Automated Software Engineering For Games (ASE4Games 2021) was held virtually on November 14th, 2021, co-located with the 36v IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2021). Five papers from all over the world were submitted, two full-papers and two short-papers were accepted. The program also featured a keynote by Mathieu Nayrolles, researcher at Ubisoft, entitled Automated Software Engineering for AAA Games.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2310.188

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering NotesSame topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207