Alkali Metal Salt Interference on the Salicylate Method for Quantifying Ammonia from Nitrogen Reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The salicylate method has been extensively used for quantifying ammonia in the emerging field of nitrogen (electro)fixation. Alkali metal salts are widely used as supporting electrolytes for nitrogen reduction, especially in the context of electrochemical nitrogen fixation. However, these salts are known to cause interferences on the salicylate method, introducing significant uncertainties in ammonia quantification. In this work, the interference of lithium, sodium and potassium chlorides, perchlorates and sulfates on the ammonia quantification results obtained using the salicylate method was experimentally quantified, and an empirical model was developed to capture the effect of the presence of these interferents on the ammonia quantification by the salicylate method. Based on the obtained experimental interference results, the tested interferents can be ranked from stronger interferent (i.e. lower admissible concentration) to weaker interferent: Li 2 SO 4 , KClO 4 , LiCl, LiClO 4 , K 2 SO 4 , NaClO 4 , NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 , KCl. The developed model can be used to assess the experimental error in ammonia quantification from nitrogen reduction, in samples containing these interferents. This model can be used to correct the interferences on the ammonia quantification, when the interferent concentration in a sample is known (or measurable).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".