MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224981980 · doi:10.18280/mmep.090219

Optimal Design of a Proportional-Derivative State Feedback Controller Based on Meta-Heuristic Optimization for a Quarter Car Suspension System

2022· article· en· W4224981980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)HeuristicSuspension (topology)Derivative (finance)Computer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Optimization problemMathematical optimizationMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a Proportional-Derivative State Feedback (PDSF) controller approach to design an active suspension system for quarter car. The objective of the PDSF controller is to eliminate the effects of road disturbances to achieve ride comfort of the driver and passengers. Finding the optimal feedback gain matrix of the PDSF controller is formulated as an optimization problem. Then, two meta-heuristic optimizations named Bees Algorithm (BA) and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) are employed to optimize the feedback gain matrix of the PDSF controller based on the Integral Time of Absolute Error (ITAE) index. The results show the superiority of the BA-based PDSF controller in terms of reducing the ITAE index in comparison with the results obtained from GWO based PDSF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it