Studying first passage problems using neural networks: A case study in the slit-well microfluidic device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents deep neural network solutions to a time-integrated Smoluchowski equation modeling the mean first passage time of nanoparticles traversing the slit-well microfluidic device. This physical scenario is representative of a broader class of parametrized first passage problems in which key output metrics are dictated by a complicated interplay of problem parameters and system geometry. Specifically, whereas these types of problems are commonly studied using particle simulations of stochastic differential equation models, here the corresponding partial differential equation model is solved using a method based on deep neural networks. The results illustrate that the neural network method is synergistic with the time-integrated Smoluchowski model: together, these are used to construct continuous mappings from key physical inputs (applied voltage and particle diameter) to key output metrics (mean first passage time and effective mobility). In particular, this capability is a unique advantage of the time-integrated Smoluchowski model over the corresponding stochastic differential equation models. Furthermore, the neural network method is demonstrated to easily and reliably handle geometry-modifying parameters, which is generally difficult to accomplish using other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".