MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224992992 · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-21-0255.1

Extreme Winter Precipitation Regimes in Eastern North America: Synoptic-Scale and Thermodynamic Environments

2022· article· en· W4224992992 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yeechian Low, John R. Gyakum, Eyad H. Atallah

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsPrecipitationClimatologyAnticycloneSubtropical ridgeSubtropicsCyclone (programming language)Environmental scienceSynoptic scale meteorologyTrough (economics)StormOceanographyGeologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We define extreme precipitation regimes (EPRs) during the eastern North American winter based on widespread and persistent heavy precipitation, using ERA5 precipitation data from 1979 to 2020. We find 62 EPRs and analyze their synoptic-scale and thermodynamic environments. EPRs impact most of eastern North America with heavy precipitation, especially from Louisiana to Quebec, and generally last for 5–8 days. They are associated with an anomalously strong 500-hPa trough–ridge over western–eastern North America that travels slowly eastward, favoring intrusions of moist, tropical air into eastern North America, and a strong baroclinic zone from the central United States to Atlantic Canada. They are also characterized by high frequencies of cyclones in the midwestern United States, anticyclones over eastern Canada and the subtropical Atlantic, and atmospheric rivers (ARs) in eastern North America. Precipitation is maintained by large moisture influxes, primarily from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, from the EPR start to the time midway through the EPR period. The influxes are often associated with ARs feeding into cyclones, where the moisture falls as precipitation. We also categorize EPRs based on the spatial anomaly correlation (AC) of synoptic-scale weather patterns between individual EPRs and the EPR composite. High AC EPRs have similar but stronger 500-hPa features over North America, greater moisture flux from the Gulf of Mexico and inland precipitation over eastern North America, farther inland cyclone track, higher frequency of subtropical Atlantic anticyclones, and lower EPR-to-EPR variability than low AC EPRs. Significance Statement Cool-season extreme precipitation regimes (EPRs) often lead to flooding and other impacts and represent a significant forecast challenge. We define and analyze EPRs during the eastern North American winter to obtain a better understanding of their associated meteorological conditions. We also categorize EPRs into two distinct categories to capture the variability among EPRs. EPRs generally last 5–8 days and are associated with slowly moving large-scale weather patterns favoring intrusions of moist, tropical air into eastern North America, a strong temperature contrast, and frequent cyclones in the midwestern United States with anticyclones to the north and south. The intrusions of moist, tropical air are often associated with atmospheric rivers (ARs) that deposit their moisture in cyclones as precipitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207