MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Addformer: Alzheimer’s Disease Detection from Structural Mri Using Fusion Transformer

2022· article· en· W4224994441 on OpenAlexafffund
Rafsanjany Kushol, Abbas Masoumzadeh, Huo Dong, Sanjay Kalra, Yee‐Hong Yang

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersALS Society of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceLeverage (statistics)Artificial intelligenceCognitive impairmentDementiaContextual image classificationTransfer of learningMachine learningDeep learningTransformerBenchmark (surveying)Pattern recognition (psychology)DiseaseImage (mathematics)MedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by degeneration of the brain. It is classified as a brain disease causing dementia that presents with memory loss and cognitive impairment. Experts primarily use brain imaging and other tests to rule out the disease. To automatically detect Alzheimer’s patients from healthy controls, this study adopts the vision transformer architecture, which can effectively capture the global or long-range relationship of image features. To further enhance the network’s performance, frequency and image domain features are fused together since MRI data is acquired in the frequency domain before being transformed to images. We train the model with selected coronal 2D slices to leverage the transfer learning property of pre-training the network using ImageNet. Finally, the majority voting of the coronal slices of an individual subject is used to generate the final classification score. Our proposed method has been evaluated on the publicly available benchmark dataset ADNI. The experimental results demonstrate the advantage of our proposed approach in terms of classification accuracy compared with that of the state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/rkushol/ADDFormer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207