“<i>I Won’t Take Bail Until We All Get It</i>”: Gender, Black Power, 1960s Student activism and the Sir George Williams Affair—An interview with Brenda Dash
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research interview explores the Sir George Williams student protest of 1969. Described as Canada’s best-known manifestation of anti-Black racism, students occupied the Sir George Williams University in protest of alleged racism toward Black and Caribbean students. While much has been written about this watershed affair, the distinct experiences of women have not received much attention. However, community narratives suggest that women played important active roles. What were women’s experiences of this protest, and how did their participation shape the legacy of the event? Featuring an interview with Brenda Dash, dubbed “a ringleader” of the affair, this article explores a frontline view of this episode in 1960s student activism. Dash offers an in-depth perspective on her participation in the affair, her arrest, and the trial. This interview lays the groundwork for locating this protest within the broader ideological struggles of the civil rights, Black Power, and social justice movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".