Modeling the Thermal Regime of a Room in a Building with a Thermal Energy Storage Envelope
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increasing demand for energy and climate change encouraged the search for new ways of using renewable energy sources, including in building structures. At present, improving energy efficiency in buildings by integrating thermal energy storage materials is an urgent task. This paper proposes a mathematical model for the thermal regime in a building with a TES building envelope. The enclosure model consists of gypsum board with 25% of phase change material (PCM). The PCM layers of different thickness reduce room temperature and heat load. The effectiveness evaluation of the proposed model involved calculating the thermal conductivity using the finite difference method. The results show that the incorporation of thermal energy storage materials can reduce temperature fluctuations in the room and maintain a comfortable temperature for a long time (up to 8 hours). With an increase in the thickness of the thermal energy storage layer, the cooling time of the exterior surface of the internal wall also increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it