MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225016383 · doi:10.3138/ctr.190.005

Connecting the Space between Us: An Interview with Multisensory Artist Salima Punjani

2022· article· en· W4225016383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jessica Watkin, Salima Punjani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSustainable Urban and Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentringSlownessVisual artsSpace (punctuation)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ArtAestheticsPandemicRest (music)SociologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This interview between co-editor Jessica Watkin and Disability artist Salima Punjani delves deeply into Punjani’s multi-sensory art practice, what it was like to create art that structures care during the COVID-19 pandemic, and, ultimately, her vision for centring slowness and rest as a method for gathering people in art spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0340.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0080.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicSustainable Urban and Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207