MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225079284 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1228604/v1

Magnetic phase diagram of the solid solution LaMn2(Ge1-xSix)2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) unraveled by powder neutron diffraction

2022· preprint· en· W4225079284 on OpenAlexaff
Anja‐Verena Mudring, Stefanie Siebeneichler, Alexander Ovchinnikov, B. Bosch-Santos, G. A. Cabrera-Pasca, Roxana Flacau, Qingzhen Huang, A. W. Carbonari, D. H. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismNeutron diffractionMagnetic structureFerromagnetismSolid solutionMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsMagnetizationDiffractionPhase (matter)Phase diagramCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structurePhysicsMagnetic fieldOpticsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The structural and magnetic properties of the ThCr 2 Si 2 -type solid solution LaMn 2 (Ge 1− x Si x ) 2 ( x = 0.0 to 1.0) have been investigated employing a combination of X-ray diffraction, magnetization and neutron diffraction measurements, which allowed establishing a magnetic composition-temperature phase diagram. Substitution of Ge by Si leads to a compression of the unit cell, which affects the magnetic exchange interactions. In particular, the magnetic structure of LaMn 2 (Ge 1− x Si x ) 2 is strongly affected by the unit cell parameter c , related to the separation of adjacent Mn layers. Commensurate antiferromagnetic layers and a canted ferromagnetic structure dominate the Si-rich part of the solid solution, whilst an incommensurate antiferromagnetic flat spiral and a conical magnetic structure are observed in the Si-poor part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207