MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4225087481 · doi:10.7759/cureus.24568

Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma to Umbilical Skin

2022· article· en· W4225087481 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Aghighi, Mohammad Bagher Shokravi, Maral Rahvar

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in OncologyLions Gate Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdenocarcinomaCDX2PathologyUmbilicus (mollusc)MetastasisCancerInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sister Mary Joseph nodule (SMJN) is a rare metastasis to umbilical skin originating from internal tumors including the stomach, ovary and large intestine and less commonly from pancreatic cancers. We report an uncommon case of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to umbilical skin. An 85-year-old female presented with a 1.8 cm protrusion of the right lateral umbilicus. The CT scan showed a 3.5 cm pancreatic lesion, peritoneal carcinomatosis and abdominal lymphadenopathy. Histology examination revealed atypical infiltrative glandular structures. Immunohistochemistry showed positive CK7, negative CDX2 and P53 with mutated patterns. These were consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma most consistent with pancreatobiliary or upper GI origin. CK7 expresses in the ductal cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. While CDX2 is positive in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, it is negative in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis of adenocarcinoma is rendered based on the presence of a pancreatic lesion in CT scan, positive CK7 and negative CDX2 in umbilical nodule tumor cells in the current patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→