MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225089159 · doi:10.1681/asn.2021060784

Molecular Characterization of Membranous Nephropathy

2022· article· en· W4225089159 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Sealfon, Laura H. Mariani, Carmen Ávila-Casado, Viji Nair, Rajasree Menon, Julien Funk, Aaron K. Wong, Gabriel Lerner, Norifumi Hayashi, Olga G. Troyanskaya, Matthias Kretzler, Laurence H. Beck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsMembranous nephropathyMedicineNephropathyGlomerulonephritisKidney diseaseCharacterization (materials science)PathologyComputational biologyBiologyInternal medicineKidneyEndocrinologyMaterials scienceNanotechnologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Statement Although membranous nephropathy (MN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome, the molecular characteristics of the kidney damage in MN remain poorly defined. In this study, the authors applied a machine-learning framework to predict diagnosis on the basis of gene expression in microdissected kidney tissue from patients with glomerulonephropathies. They found that MN has a glomerular transcriptional signature that distinguishes it from other glomerulonephropathies and identified a set of MN-specific genes differentially expressed across two independent cohorts and robustly recovered in an additional validation cohort. They also found the MN-specific genes are enriched in targets of transcription factor NF-κB and are predominantly expressed in podocytes. This work provides a molecular snapshot of MN and elucidates transcriptional alterations specific to this disease. Background Molecular characterization of nephropathies may facilitate pathophysiologic insight, development of targeted therapeutics, and transcriptome-based disease classification. Although membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of adult-onset nephrotic syndrome, the molecular pathways of kidney damage in MN require further definition. Methods We applied a machine-learning framework to predict diagnosis on the basis of gene expression from the microdissected kidney tissue of participants in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) cohort. We sought to identify differentially expressed genes between participants with MN versus those of other glomerulonephropathies across the NEPTUNE and European Renal cDNA Bank (ERCB) cohorts, to find MN-specific gene modules in a kidney-specific functional network, and to identify cell-type specificity of MN-specific genes using single-cell sequencing data from reference nephrectomy tissue. Results Glomerular gene expression alone accurately separated participants with MN from those with other nephrotic syndrome etiologies. The top predictive classifier genes from NEPTUNE participants were also differentially expressed in the ERCB participants with MN. We identified a signature of 158 genes that are significantly differentially expressed in MN across both cohorts, finding 120 of these in a validation cohort. This signature is enriched in targets of transcription factor NF-κB. Clustering these MN-specific genes in a kidney-specific functional network uncovered modules with functional enrichments, including in ion transport, cell projection morphogenesis, regulation of adhesion, and wounding response. Expression data from reference nephrectomy tissue indicated 43% of these genes are most highly expressed by podocytes. Conclusions These results suggest that, relative to other glomerulonephropathies, MN has a distinctive molecular signature that includes upregulation of many podocyte-expressed genes, provides a molecular snapshot of MN, and facilitates insight into MN’s underlying pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207