Rotational Spectroscopy of 2‐Furoic Acid and Its Dimer: Conformational Distribution and Double Proton Tunneling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Structural and tunneling properties of the 2‐furoic acid (FA) monomer and dimer were investigated using rotational spectroscopy and DFT calculations. CREST, a conformational ensemble space exploration tool, was used to identify all possible low‐energy conformations of the FA monomer and dimer, followed by the DFT geometry optimization and harmonic frequency calculations. Broadband rotational spectra in the 2–6 and 8–12 GHz regions were recorded in a supersonic jet expansion. The monomeric FA was found to exist dominantly as three different conformers: I , II , and III in a jet, with I and II taking on the cis ‐COOH configuration while III having the trans ‐COOH configuration. For the FA dimer, only the I – II conformer was observed experimentally, whereas the symmetric I – I and II – II conformers were not observed because of their zero dipole moments. The analysis of the splittings in the rotational transitions of I – II allowed one to extract the tunneling splitting to be 1056.0(12) MHz. The barrier height was determined to be ∼442 cm −1 using the scaled potential energy scans at several different levels of theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".