MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225105053 · doi:10.1039/d2ra01231f

Hydrogen production rates of aluminum reacting with varying densities of supercritical water

2022· article· en· W4225105053 on OpenAlex
Keena Trowell, Samuel Goroshin, David L. Frost, Jeffrey M. Bergthorson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersTrottier Institute for Sustainability in Engineering and DesignFonds de recherche du QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsSupercritical fluidYield (engineering)ChemistryWater vaporHydrogenBulk densityDrop (telecommunication)Reaction rateAluminiumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)DiffusionMaterials scienceThermodynamicsCatalysisChromatographyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen production rates of aluminum reacting with various densities of supercritical water are determined using a novel method. High-density supercritical water is found to be the most efficient oxidizer, in terms of both reaction rates and yields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it