MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225115336 · doi:10.11159/iceptp22.193

Optimization of DLLME Extraction Parameters for Pesticides Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography

2022· article· en· W4225115336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ezgi Altiparmak, Emine Yılmaz, Filiz Dadaşer-Çelik, Nuray Ateş

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuErciyes Üniversitesi
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyPesticideHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChemistryComputer scienceAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pesticides have been used widely all over the world for centuries to increase agricultural production and to combat harmful pests.Pesticides used for agriculture, household, and public health sectors eventually reach water bodies, posing a risk to human health and the environment even in micro concentrations.Each country legally sets its own maximum allowable limits to regulate pesticides residues.Therefore, it is necessary to monitor pesticide residues in water resources, especially if they are used for drinking water purposes.With the technological developments, nowadays sensitive analytical instruments employing complex analysis methods such as GC/MS and LC/MS have been used to analyze pesticides.Pesticide residues must be concentrated by different extraction methods before HPLC analysis to be able to detect them in micro levels with high precision and low detection limits.The aim of this study is to develop an analytical method for the analysis of acetochlor and metolachlor pesticides by HPLC instrument with dispersive liquid-liquid micro extraction (DLLME) method.In order to determine optimum conditions for DLLME extraction method, extraction solvent type (chloroform, dichloromethane and 1,2 dichloroethane), dispersive solvent type (acetonitrile, methanol and isopropyl alcohol), flowrate (1, 1.2 and 1.5 ml/min), oven temperature (20°C, 30 °C, 40 °C and 50 °C), volume of extraction solvent (300, 350 and 400 µl), and mobile phase mixture (60/40, 70/30 and 80/20 acetonitrile/water in v/v) were comprehensively investigated with Taguchi experimental design.The optimized conditions for acetochlor and metolachlor were obtained as: extraction solvent of 1,2-dichloroethane, dispersive solvent of acetonitrile and methanol, extraction solvent volume of 400 µL and 300 µL, dispersive volume of 1 ml, flowrate of 1 ml/min and 1.2 ml/min, temperature of 40°C and 50°C and mobile phase mixture of 70/30 v/v and 80/20 v/v, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyFrench-language works237,207