MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225124397 · doi:10.1016/j.dche.2022.100030

Data-Driven Natural Gas Compressor Models for Gas Transport Network Optimization

2022· article· en· W4225124397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Chemical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGas compressorDimensionless quantityNatural gasArtificial neural networkMinificationComputer scienceSurrogate modelMathematical optimizationCompressor stationEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fuel cost minimization problem (FCMP) for natural gas transport is important because of the immense energy consumed by compressors to satisfy increasing natural gas demands. Current approaches to the FCMP use inaccurate simplified models, or more complex and computationally challenging models, to describe compressor performance. This paper develops two novel data-driven surrogate models, namely, the dimensionless group based model and the deep neural network (DNN) model. The DNN involves rectified linear units as activation functions, so it can be reformulated into mixed-integer linear constraints in the FCMP. The case study results show that both the dimensionless group based and the DNN models achieve better accuracy than two typical surrogate models in the literature, and they are also computationally more efficient for optimization. The computational performance of the dimensionless based model is sensitive to gas supply and demand data, while that of the DNN model is robust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it