Insights into the Genetic Architecture and Genomic Prediction of Powdery Mildew Resistance in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Powdery mildew (PM), caused by the fungus Oidium lini in flax, can cause defoliation and reduce seed yield and quality. To date, one major dominant gene (Pm1) and three quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosomes 1, 7 and 9 have been reported for PM resistance. To fully dissect the genetic architecture of PM resistance and identify QTL, a diverse flax core collection of 372 accessions augmented with an additional 75 breeding lines were sequenced, and PM resistance was evaluated in the field for eight years (2010–2017) in Morden, Manitoba, Canada. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed using two single-locus and seven multi-locus statistical models with 247,160 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the phenotypes of the 447 individuals for each year separately as well as the means over years. A total of 349 quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) were identified, of which 44 large-effect QTNs (R2 = 10–30%) were highly stable over years. The total number of favourable alleles per accession was significantly correlated with PM resistance (r = 0.74), and genomic selection (GS) models using all identified QTNs generated significantly higher predictive ability (r = 0.93) than those constructed using the 247,160 genome-wide random SNP (r = 0.69), validating the overall reliability of the QTNs and showing the additivity of PM resistance in flax. The QTNs were clustered on the distal ends of all 15 chromosomes, especially on chromosome 5 (0.4–5.6 Mb and 9.4–16.9 Mb) and 13 (4.7–5.2 Mb). To identify candidate genes, a dataset of 3230 SNPs located in resistance gene analogues (RGAs) was used as input for GWAS, from which an additional 39 RGA-specific QTNs were identified. Overall, 269 QTN loci harboured 445 RGAs within the 200 Kb regions spanning the QTNs, including 45 QTNs located within the RGAs. These RGAs supported by significant QTN/SNP allele effects were mostly nucleotide binding site and leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) belonging to either coiled-coil (CC) NLR (CNL) or toll interleukin-1 (TIR) NLR (TNL), receptor-like kinase (RLK), receptor-like protein kinase (RLP), transmembrane-coiled-coil (TM-CC), WRKY, and mildew locus O (MLO) genes. These results constitute an important genomic tool for resistance breeding and gene cloning for PM in flax.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".