MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225128114 · doi:10.1149/10701.9663ecst

Appraising the Prototypes of Smart Cities Policies Taking on the Impact of Pandemic

2022· article· en· W4225128114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Damanpreet Chugh, Ambuj Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicSAFERVulnerability (computing)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SlumEconomic growthGeographyVulnerability assessmentBusinessEnvironmental planningSocioeconomicsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthComputer securitySociologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)MedicineDiseaseEconomicsComputer sciencePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With many sections of the city affected due to pandemic, there is a dire need to assess the vulnerability of pandemic hit areas in a city. Mainly, marketplaces, slum areas, residential areas, transportations mean, educational institutions, and religious areas, which comes under high density people intensive areas, are vulnerable to any future pandemic. New policies, capacity building, and technologies among people have paved a safer way in eradication and/or curbing the pandemic. There are set prototypes that have proven their worth when implemented within the city. Global smart cities like London, Spain, Montreal, and Indian cities like Bengaluru, Pune have developed solutions to safely handle the pandemic and kept their citizens served and informed. The paper focuses on the study about policies implemented during pandemic in various cities in India and in western world for curbing the spread of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207