Stopping Time Detection of Wood Panel Compression: A Functional Time-Series Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider determining the optimal stopping time for the glue curing of wood panels in an automatic process environment. Using the near-infrared spectroscopy technology to monitor the manufacturing process ensures substantial savings in energy and time. We collect a time-series of curves from a near-infrared spectrum probe consisting of 72 spectra and aim to detect an optimal stopping time. We propose an estimation procedure to determine the optimal stopping time of wood panel compression and the estimation uncertainty associated with the estimated stopping time. Our method first divides the entire data set into a training sample and a testing sample, then iteratively computes integrated squared forecast errors based on the testing sample. We then apply a structural break detection method with one breakpoint to determine an estimated optimal stopping time from a univariate time-series of the integrated squared forecast errors. We also investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method via a series of simulation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it