Mental Health Benefits of Physical Activity in Youth with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) are at heightened risk for mental health problems. Physical activity is an effective strategy to promote quality of life (QoL) and reduce mental health symptoms along with evidence-based therapies. This study described existing literature examining the mental health outcomes (e.g., QoL, well-being, anxiety, and depression) of physical activity interventions in children and adolescents with CP to help inform the implementation of physical activity interventions for this population. METHODS: Ascoping review framework was used to map the existing quantitative literature. RESULTS: The search returned 243 articles; after titles, abstracts, and full manuscripts were reviewed, 21 articles were included. The association between physical activity and QoL was examined in most studies (n = 17) with mixed findings. Eight studies documented at least one significant positive association between physical activity and QoL, and four found that physical activity interventions were highly enjoyable. Only one study assessed anxiety and/or depression following a PA intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity may benefit aspects of QoL and mental health symptoms; however, this was not a consistent finding in the existing literature. Along with other therapies, physical activity interventions may be valuable in improving QoL, and in turn, the mental health symptoms of children with CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".