Extraction, Applications and Characterization of Plant Fibers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the second half of the twentieth century, industrial and scientific interests in plant fibers (PFs) have resulted in their resounding comeback as engineering materials. This chapter is concerned with the characterization of PF materials. Good knowledge of the properties of these materials is essential for safe design of the related structures. Bast fibers that are collected from the phloem surrounding the stem of certain dicotyledonous plants, for instance, are among the most used, owing to their higher tensile strength. However, for an optimum utilization of PFs, a relevant assessment of their physico-chemical and mechanical properties is very crucial. As it is now well established, PFs’ properties are largely influenced by their hierarchic composite microstructure and their viscoelastic behavior. This book chapter focuses on the presentation of various experimental approaches used to characterize the elastic and viscoelastic behaviors of plant fibers. Consideration of their blending in sheet form and relevant mechanical properties will also be of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it