MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225150358 · doi:10.1149/10701.12493ecst

Impact of Human Resource Management on Talent Management at Apple

2022· article· en· W4225150358 on OpenAlexaff
Shubhangee Ramaswamy, Devidas Golhar, Srinivas Kumar Swamy, Poonam Pawar

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHuman Resource and Talent Management
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTalent managementHuman resource managementBusinessData collectionKnowledge managementMarketingComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research was to find out how HRM influences the performance of talent management in an organization. For this purpose, Apple Inc. was selected and data was collected through primary data collection method by sharing a survey questionnaire with 25 random employees of Apple. From their responses, it was found that the HRM department of Apple ensures the effectiveness of the organization’s different talent management techniques. It was found that the HRM department is responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining talent management methods in an organization such as Apple Inc. Talent management method at Apple is effective due to its HRM department only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicHuman Resource and Talent ManagementFrench-language works237,207