MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225156143 · doi:10.54550/eca2022v2s3r18

Curious cyclic sieving on increasing tableaux

2022· article· en· W4225156143 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Gaetz, Oliver Pechenik, Jessica Striker, J. Swanson

Bibliographic record

VenueEnumerative Combinatorics and Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaSimons Foundation Autism Research InitiativeNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsChemistryComputer scienceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove a cyclic sieving result for the set of 3 × k packed increasing tableaux with maximum entry m := 3 + k under K-promotion.The "curiosity" is that the sieving polynomial arises from the q-hook formula for standard tableaux of "toothbrush shape" (2 3 , 1 k-2 ) with m + 1 boxes, whereas K-promotion here only has order m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnumerative Combinatorics and ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207