MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225160254 · doi:10.11159/icsect22.176

Valorisation of Local Residues, By-Products and Wastes into Ceramic Materials for Civil Engineer Application

2022· article· en· W4225160254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Régis Martinent, Yasmine Lalau, Guilhem Dejean, Doan Pham Minh

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValorisationWaste managementCeramicEngineeringCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceConstruction engineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural sand is the primary substance needed in construction field, mainly in concrete formulation, but also to make asphalt and glass. The Global Aggregates Information Network (GAIN) estimated a rise of global aggregates demand from 50 to 60 billion tonnes per annum by 2030; this increase is far from reaching its climax, considering upcoming population increase, urbanisation and economic growth Even if natural sand is generally considered as an unlimited resource, only less than 5 % (marine sand) of the quantity available on Earth reach properties requirements to be used as building materials. Moreover, overexploitation of the last few available deposits leads to several negative impacts on environment such as degradation of beaches, marine biodiversity troubles and increasing pollution due to import growth

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionFrench-language works237,207