Food Wastes As Adsorbent Materials for Water Decontamination: The Use of Kiwi Peels To Remove Emerging Pollutants and Textile Dyes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high rate of resource consumption and large amounts of produced wastes have been reported to drive towards an ecological collapse. Interestingly, a circular economy approach could reduce this environmental concern avoiding the waste management, and all outputs (products, by-products, wastes) would become inputs (material and energy) to other processes. When the model is based on the production of renewable biological resources, and these resources are converted into valueadded products, the concept of bio-circular economy take place. About this purpose, the use of fruit Peels as food/agricultural wastes have attained interest, as adsorbent materials for water purification, avoiding their disposal according to the principles of Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development. Indeed, among the explored wastes, Kiwi Peels removed the largest number of contaminants. Kiwi Peels were characterized by adopting in synergy FTIR-ATR, TG and SEM analyses, before and after their use, and as result they are proposed as recyclable adsorbent. To infer information about the behaviour of Kiwi Peels during water treatments, model contaminants were selected and investigated (Ciprofloxacin, CIP, and Direct Blue 78, DB); so, the role of several parameters affecting the process was assessed. The thermodynamic, the adsorption isotherms and kinetics were also studied. Finally, to extend the lifetime of Kiwi Peels, desorption experiments were carried out by using hot water or salt solutions. 10 cycles of adsorption/desorption were studied, evidencing the recycling of both pollutants and Kiwi Peels (Figure Moreover, another aspect investigated in this work regards the possibility of using Advance Oxidation Processes (AOPs) to induce the pollutants solid-state photodegradation as an alternative approach for adsorbent regeneration. Also, in this case, FTIR-ATR, SEM, and TG analyses were used in synergy for investigating the adsorbent features after the AOPs' application. If, on the one hand, the SEM and FTIR-ATR results revealed the absence of important post-treatment changes, on the other hand, the TGA suggested some modifications. Finally, mixtures of pollutants were also studied and in the case of dyes, dyeing experiments were also performed, evidencing the dye ability to colour cotton fibers after the colour recycling (Figure Particularly, the experiments of dyeing were executed during the Kiwi Peels desorption in hot water at 323 K, without further additives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it