MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225242773 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2022.3170693

Effect of Signal-Dependent Shot Noise on Visible Light Positioning

2022· article· en· W4225242773 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Raza Cheema, Malek Alsmadi, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationMultilaterationAsynchronous communicationComputer scienceTelecommunications linkRSSTime of arrivalNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Position (finance)Bit error rateSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Degradation (telecommunications)AlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringWirelessArtificial intelligenceAcousticsOpticsPhysicsLight-emitting diodeDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the error bounds for position estimation in downlink visible light communication (VLC) systems. More precisely, we use Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) to study the effect of signal-dependent shot noise (SDSN) on the error performance in visible light positioning. We consider synchronous, quasi-synchronous, and asynchronous visible light positioning (VLP) systems. The system performance is assessed based on the position estimation, and uses information from parameters relating to the time of arrival (TOA), time difference of arrival (TDOA), and received signal strength (RSS). The results demonstrate that SDSN has a negative impact on the error bounds in all considered scenarios. Moreover, the level of degradation observed is not uniform among all cases at higher SDSN levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207