MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225245840 · doi:10.54648/gtcj2022015

The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison

2022· article· en· W4225245840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Omer Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Trade and Customs Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Valuation (finance)BusinessPandemicSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakValue (mathematics)International tradeFinanceInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past year, due to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), sea freight prices and domestic transportation costs have risen sharply, an increase that has not been seen for many years. This leads to a change in customs valuation. In most countries worldwide, collection of duties is based on the cost, insurance and freight (CIF) value of goods, there, any increase in transportation costs, lead to additional collection of import duties. The United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, however, impose duties on the free on board (FOB) value of goods, meaning, therefore, transport costs changes do not lead to additional import duties in those countries. COVID-19 effects on transportation costs are a global issue and may last for a long time. Therefore, governments that impose customs on the CIF value, should consider waiving the COVID-19 extra shipping costs, for customs valuation purposes, until we are back to a ‘normal’ period. customs, valuation, transport, Incoterms, CIF, FOB, covid19, Israel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Trade and Customs JournalSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207