MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225249609 · doi:10.3390/seeds1020010

Maternal Environmental Effects of Temperature and Exogenous Gibberellic Acid on Seed and Seedling Traits of Four Populations of Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis)

2022· article· en· W4225249609 on OpenAlexaff
Britanie M. LeFait, Mirwais M. Qaderi

Bibliographic record

VenueSeeds · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeedlingGerminationGibberellic acidBiologyEvening primroseDry weightHorticultureOenotheraDry matterAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earlier studies have considered the separate effects of temperature and gibberellic acid (GA3) on plants and seeds. However, the combined effects of these factors on parent plants and their progeny have received little attention. We investigated the effects of two temperature regimes (24/20 °C and 28/24 °C, 16 h light/ 8 h dark) and two GA3 treatments (for two weeks) on the reproductive yield of parent plants, the subsequent seed germinability, and the seedling traits of four local populations of evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Mature seeds were harvested and germinated, and seedlings were grown under the two temperature regimes. Parent plants were phenotyped for flower area and diameter, capsule length and width, full and empty capsule masses, and seed number and mass per capsule. Additionally, seed total germination and germination rate were determined, alongside stem height and dry mass, leaf number, area and dry mass, root dry mass, and total dry mass in seedlings. GA3 promoted the flowering of all populations in the first year. Maturation drying under higher temperatures resulted in more viable and faster germinating seeds. Higher GA3 did not affect total germination, but increased the germination rate of seeds that produced seedlings with lower total dry mass under the higher temperature regime. In conclusion, all populations responded similarly to GA3 treatment in terms of flowering, but responded differently to temperature during seed maturation, and subsequent seed germination and seedling growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedsSame topicFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationFrench-language works237,207