PD34-09 VESICO-VAGINAL FISTULA PREVALENCE AND REPAIR PATTERNS: A LARGE RETROSPECTIVE POPULATION-BASED COHORT ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD34-09 VESICO-VAGINAL FISTULA PREVALENCE AND REPAIR PATTERNS: A LARGE RETROSPECTIVE POPULATION-BASED COHORT ANALYSIS Sarah Neu, Jennifer Locke, Bo Zhang, Refik Saskin, and Sender Herschorn Sarah NeuSarah Neu More articles by this author , Jennifer LockeJennifer Locke More articles by this author , Bo ZhangBo Zhang More articles by this author , Refik SaskinRefik Saskin More articles by this author , and Sender HerschornSender Herschorn More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002585.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In North America vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) are most commonly due to iatrogenic injury and have a significant negative impact on quality of life. Failed surgical repair of VVF can lead to ongoing morbidity. The objective of our study is to determine the change in rate of VVF repair and failures over time, and to determine risk factors for surgical repair failure. METHODS: We completed a population-based, retrospective cohort study including all women in Ontario, Canada, aged 18 and older between 2005-2018. Patients who underwent VVF repair were identified using linked administrative databases and compared to those who required a second VVF repair for primary repair failure. Broken line regression was used to determine changes in the rate of VVF repair over time. Multivariable cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify risk factors for VVF repair failure. RESULTS: 814 patients were identified as having undergone VVF repair. Of these patients, 117 required a second surgical repair (14%). Mean age at time of surgery was 52 years (SD 15). Most patients had undergone prior gynecological surgery (68%), and 76% were due to iatrogenic injury. Most repairs were performed by urologists (60%) and completed trans-vaginal (66%). Annual rate of VVF repair significantly decreased by 0.14/100,000 women in each year from 2005-2009, and insignificantly decreased from 2010-2018. No significant change in VVF re-repair rates were found. Predictors of VVF re-repair included iatrogenic injury as etiology of VVF (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.9, p=0.009), and having the primary repair done with cystoscopic fulguration (HR 6.1 95% CI 3.1-11.1, p<0.0005,); protective factor was surgeon number of years in practice (21+ years - HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p=0.02). Surgeons with more than 21 years of experience halve half as many patients requiring second VVF repair. CONCLUSIONS: VVF repair rates have decreased over time, however re-repair rates have remained constant over a 13-year time-period. Iatrogenic injury as the cause of VVF is twice as likely to result in the need for a re-repair, compared to other causes, and repair done with cystoscopic fulguration were 6 times as likely to fail compared to a trans-vaginal or abdominal approach. Surgeon years in practice may protect against the need for a second VVF surgery. Source of Funding: University of Toronto Functional Urology Program © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e563 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sarah Neu More articles by this author Jennifer Locke More articles by this author Bo Zhang More articles by this author Refik Saskin More articles by this author Sender Herschorn More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".