Three new species of <i>Asteromenia</i> (Hymenocladiaceae, Rhodophyta) from Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Three new species of the red algal genus Asteromenia (Hymenocladiaceae, Rhodophyta) are described based on morphological and molecular analyses. DNA analyses of recent collections of topotype specimens of A. examinans from the Houtman Abrolhos Islands (Western Australia) have revealed that the specimens used in earlier studies were misidentified and represent an undescribed species, herein described as A. juliannae. Two additional new species, A. crenulata and A. praetermissa are described from the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, and Norfolk Island, respectively. For the most part, the new species showed morphological overlap and could not be discriminated based on morphology alone; DNA sequencing is therefore considered essential for accurate species recognition. The potential for misidentification of morphologically similar specimens highlights the need for sequence analyses and reference barcoding to be based on type or topotype specimens. The adoption of molecular methods in alpha taxonomy has led to the recognition of considerable diversity in the Rhodymeniales and it is envisaged that further collecting will add even more taxa to Australia’s rich algal flora.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".