MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225283794 · doi:10.2514/1.g006651

Fault-Tolerant Reduced-Attitude Control for Spacecraft Constrained Boresight Reorientation

2022· article· en· W4225283794 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Shao, Qinglei Hu, Zheng Zhu, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityYork University
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorAngular velocitySpacecraftAttitude controlFault toleranceAngular accelerationComputer scienceOvershoot (microwave communication)EngineeringControl engineeringPhysicsControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is devoted to investigating the fault-tolerant reduced-attitude control problem for boresight reorientation of an uncertain spacecraft subject to pointing and angular velocity constraints. First, the stereographic projection is used to transform this problem to an obstacle avoidance problem on a two-dimensional Euclidean sphere world with circular obstacles. Then, an adaptive fault-tolerant control strategy is proposed to solve the transformed problem, by designing two potential functions for constraint handling in conjunction with a sliding vector containing hyperbolic tangent functions. Stability analysis shows that the derived controller can achieve asymptotic convergence of the gradient of the obstacle avoidance potential and angular velocities, while ensuring the satisfaction of both pointing and angular velocity constraints, despite the presence of unknown time-varying inertia parameters, disturbances, and actuator faults. In particular, benefiting from incorporating the spacecraft principal moments of inertia into the potential field design, the risk of the system losing strong controllability under multiplicative actuator faults is greatly reduced. To accommodate actuator faults under input saturation, the adaptive fault-tolerant controller is further extended to a saturated counterpart, which is capable of making full use of the remaining actuation power to react to actuator faults. Finally, simulation results are presented to demonstrate our theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207