MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225302941 · doi:10.52768/2766-7820/1639

Healthy disorders by WLAN-exposure

2022· article· en· W4225302941 on OpenAlexaff
L. von Klitzing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Physicists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtifact (error)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAudiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By a diagnostic routine of a “burn-out”-patient, additionally claiming an electrosensitivity, there was tested the activity of the autonomic nervous system by electromyogram (EMG). Analyzing the frequency we found an artificial 10 Hz-component like those of WLAN-emitters as a dominant signal. By the following anamnestic discussion, the patient told about a longtime exposure to an active WLAN-equipment in office. Testing other patients using this communication-technique, there was a great number with the same 10 Hz-artifact in EMG. Additionally, some of these patients point out an artificial ECG. Theses data demonstrate the conflicts with the ICNIRP safety guidelines for this type of electromagnetic exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Images and Medical Case ReportsSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207