Comprehensive overview of the available pharmacotherapy for the treatment of non-neurogenic overactive bladder in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition highly prevalent in children and causing bothersome symptoms. It is often associated with deterioration of quality of life and can be devastating for patients and their families. Prompt initiation of conservative measures should be the backbone of treatment. When conservative management fails, pharmacological options must be considered. AREAS COVERED: Although antimuscarinics are considered the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for OAB, only two agents are currently approved for the pediatric population. Oxybutynin and propiverine are discussed in this review, as well as other non-approved antimuscarinic agents and β3-agonists with related literature to substantiate their use in children. Dual therapy along with medication adherence and persistence is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The treatment of OAB in children is demanding and one must rely on a structured, stepwise approach to achieve success. Discussing conservative measures and prescribing medication is not enough. Clinicians should actively involve children and their families in the treatment, set realistic expectations, and closely monitor side effects and medication adherence to ensure maximal efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".