MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225370032 · doi:10.24908/fede.v23i1.15368

Policy Proposal for Canadian the Government to Counter Disinformation

2022· article· en· W4225370032 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Blair Maddock-Ferrie

Bibliographic record

VenueFederalism-E · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisinformationCensorshipGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceBalance (ability)Law and economicsInternet privacyComputer securityLawComputer scienceSociologySocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of disinformation on Canada have been significant, yet despite the problem being identified seven years ago by NATO, the problem has only grown in intensity. In 2019 the Canadian government put out an open call for policy proposals to counter disinformation, this paper attempt to prove one such policy proposal that attempts to balance freedom of expression with creating a cost to the malicious actor. This paper further examines the root issues with countering disinformation with censorship and the risks that such a policy incurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederalism-ESame topicCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207