Variations in the bony architecture of the greater palatine canal: An anatomical report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The greater palatine canal route has been well‐described in adults for the purposes of anesthetizing the branches of the maxillary division of trigeminal nerve for the relief of sphenopalatine neuralgia [ 11] . The canal also provides direct access to the contents of the PPF [ 12 ] . A complex array of vascular and neural structures characterizes this posterior maxillary region where the GPC is located. Its surgical anatomy can get further complicated by any anatomic variations and identification of vital structures becomes difficult, especially when bleeding during surgery obscures the region. Accurate knowledge of normal anatomy and common anatomical variations therefore remain crucial in minimizing intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with invasive microsurgical approaches to this region. The aim of this study was to explore the architecture of the GPC for any anatomic variations. Material & Method In total, 30 adult dried and intact skull specimens were selected. The selection criteria included an intact hard palate with erupted 3 rd molars and an intact lateral nasal wall on both sides. The exclusion criteria included any major craniofacial deformities, excessive bone resorption, very old specimens. The bony walls of the GPC were observed by passing a black wire. Findings 4 out of 30 specimens showed marked variations in the bony medial wall of the greater palatine canal (GPC). Partial to complete malfusion between the posterior surface of the maxilla and the perpendicular plate of palatine bone was observed. This might be the result of embryological malformation. Conclusion The present study provided information regarding the existence of some degree of anatomical variation in the bony architecture of greater palatine canal. Significance This might help surgeons visualize over the possibility of the existence of any such variation while performing any surgical procedure in the posterior maxillary area. In order to establish the embryological basis of these findings, investigation on a larger number of specimens is highly suggested by the authors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".