MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GPR55‐Dependent Excitation of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons by Lysophosphatidylcholine

2022· article· en· W4225384999 on OpenAlexafffund
Aidan S. Bennett, Taylor Alward, David E. Reed, Alan Lomax

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDorsal root ganglionChemistryNociceptorLysophosphatidylcholineVisceral painInternal medicineNeuroscienceMedicineNociceptionEndocrinologySpinal cordBiologyReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irritable Bowel Syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder that leads to chronic abdominal pain. The perception of this visceral pain involves peripheral mechanisms, such as nociceptors with cell bodies in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and axons in the gut wall, and central mechanisms, such as neuroplasticity within the spinal cord and brain. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), which has recently been shown to bind to GPR55 in human prostate carcinoma cells, is released from cell membranes and is elevated in patients with IBS. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons express GPR55, and activation of GPR55 has been implicated in inflammatory pain. Therefore, we hypothesised that elevated LPC during IBS contributes to pain due to its activation of GPR55 on dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, leading to the excitation of visceral pain pathways. Current clamp recordings revealed that application of LPC (10 µM) to murine DRG neurons depolarised the resting membrane potential (p = 0.0001) by approximately 8 mV and decreased the rheobase (p < 0.05) by approximately 20%. Using ratiometric Ca2+ imaging using FURA‐2 AM, LPC (10 µM) doubled intracellular [Ca2+]i. This effect was significantly reduced by the selective GPR55 antagonist CID16020046 (10 µM) (p < 0.05), suggesting the response to LPC is at least partially mediated by GPR55. The source of the [Ca2+] elevation following LPC application was elucidated using cyclopiazonic acid (CPA; 10 µM), which depletes intracellular Ca2+ stores, and a 0‐Ca2+ external solution to remove the contribution of Ca2+ influx from extracellular sources. While both significantly decreased the Ca2+ influx elicited by LPC, the 0‐Ca2+ external solution almost abolished the effect (p < 0.0001) of LPC. Together, these data suggest that the increased [Ca2+] elicited by LPC activation of GPR55 is partially mediated through the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores but is mostly due to influx of extracellular Ca2+.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207