MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sexual Dimorphism in Response to Vitamins B3, B9 and B12, Used in Combination, in a Mice Model of Heart Failure Induced by Pressure Overload

2022· article· en· W4225392431 on OpenAlexafffund
Chloé David, Sonia Deschêches, Bertrand Bouchard, Isabelle Robillard, Yan Shi, Marie‐Eve Higgins, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Matthieu Ruiz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSexual dimorphismPressure overloadHeart failureInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyPsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Heart failure (HF) is still a major cause of mortality worldwide. HF pathogenesis involves disturbances in cardiac energy metabolism. Studies have shown that preventive treatment with a diet supplemented with vitamins B3 or B9/B12 in experimental models of HF, exhibits beneficial effects on cardiac and mitochondrial functions and improves survival. Therefore, the overall objective of our pilot study is to evaluate the curative benefit of a synthetic diet enriched with vitamins B3 (nicotinamide riboside), B9 and B12 (BVit) in a mouse model of HF based on the hypothesis that this enriched diet is beneficial for cardiac function via an improvement of cardiac metabolism. Method Pressure overload was induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in 8‐week‐old male and female C57Bl6/N mice. Four weeks post‐TAC and according to their cardiac function evaluated by echocardiography, mice were randomised to a BVit‐enriched diet or not and compared to SHAM animals. The criteria of selection for randomisation were as follows: 10% decrease in ejection fraction (EF), 30% increase in left ventricular (LV) mass and an average pressure gradient of 60mmHg. Mice survival was evaluated and cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography every 4 weeks. Blood samples were taken at 8 weeks of treatment in fasted mice (5 hours) for non‐targeted lipidomics mass spectrometry‐based analysis. Results Our pilot study show that survival is not improved in males while mortality is reduced in females from 12 weeks of treatment. In males, the reduced EF in the TAC group is not improved by BVit treatment and myocardial hypertrophy, as illustrated by the left ventricular mass (+20% in TAC), is exacerbated with BVit treatment. In contrast, in females, both EF and cardiac hypertrophy were improved (+20% and ‐13% respectively) after 12 weeks of BVit treatment. To better understand the sexual dimorphism in the response of BVit, non‐targeted lipidomics was used on plasma from mice following 8 weeks of treatment. In TAC‐females, compared to their SHAM controls, a decrease in triglycerides (TG) and an increase in choline phospholipids were observed while the lipid profile was normalized with BVit treatment. In TAC‐males vs SHAM, however, TGs were significantly increased and the treatment with BVit exacerbated the lipidomic profile both in terms of TGs and additional lipid species (identification in progress). Conclusion Our pilot study suggests a sexual dimorphism in the response to BVit treatment in experimental HF. Indeed, the benefit of BVit treatment is only shown in females with a delay in the mortality rate associated with improved cardiac function and normalisation of lipid disturbances. To explore and understand the mechanisms underlying this sexual dimorphism, the lipid profile hypothesis appears as a relevant avenue to explore in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→