MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comprehensive Analysis of miRNA Regulation of MGAT3 Using the miRFluR Assay

2022· article· en· W4225392801 on OpenAlexaff
Fatema T. Zohora, Lara K. Mahal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycobiologymicroRNAComputational biologyBiologyCrosstalkGlycanCell biologyGeneGlycoproteinGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies related to miRNAs and their ability to tune protein expression have gained much attention in recent years. In the field of glycobiology, miRNAs are now given special consideration as they have been shown to be key regulators of many glycosylation pathways. The enzyme MGAT3 (β‐1,4‐mannosyl‐glycoprotein 4‐beta‐N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase) is responsible for the addition of a bisecting GlcNAc to the core mannose residue of complex or hybrid N‐ glycans. This is a unique modification of complex N‐ glycans that has been reported to play important roles in signal transduction, growth factor signaling, tumor progression and metastasis. In this project, we generated a comprehensive map of the regulation of MGAT3 by miRNA using a newly developed high throughput assay: miRFluR. This assay uses ratiometric analysis of a genetically encoded dual‐color fluorescence reporter (cerulean/mCherry) to identify regulatory miRNA:mRNA interactions. A dataset for the interaction between the entire human miRome (~2700 miRs) and MGAT3 has been collected and analysis of the miR regulatory map is presented. Our data provides insight into the regulation of this important glycan and its functions in disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→